12 Testosterone Boosters, Ranked by What's Actually Been Tested
For each one: who took part, what was measured, and what actually changed. Ranked from no human testosterone evidence to modest signals. Tap “See the studies” under any booster for the sources.
- No human testosterone evidence
- Tested, didn't budge
- Moved only in specific people
- Modest signal
The anchor source is a 2024 systematic review by a team of urologists (Morgado et al., International Journal of Impotence Research). They looked at 52 studies covering 27 proposed testosterone boosters. Their conclusion: most fail to increase total testosterone.


- #12Fadogia agrestisNo human testosterone evidence
Promoted online for testosterone. Who took part in the research? Rats.
See the studies (3)
- A plant used in traditional African medicine.
- In a 2005 study, male rats given the stem extract had higher testosterone.
- In a later study, the same research team reported what it called “indications of adverse effects” on the rats’ testicular function.
- We couldn’t find a single human trial measuring testosterone (PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov, searched October 3, 2026).

Avula et al. · Planta Med · 2019 · PubMed 30170324 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Yakubu et al. · Asian J Androl · 2005 · PubMed 16281088 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Yakubu et al. · J Ethnopharmacol · 2008 · PubMed 18023305 · screenshot via Europe PMC - #11TurkesteroneNo human testosterone evidence
No human trial on testosterone found. The closest study measured other markers.
See the studies (4)
- An ecdysteroid, from the same chemical family as the hormones insects use to molt. Promoted as a natural anabolic.
- The closest human study (2024) gave 11 young men single doses and measured other markers, not testosterone. The authors said the data “fail to fully support” it as a potent anabolic supplement.
- Its close relative, ecdysterone, was tested for 8 weeks in trained men: no difference in testosterone, no difference in strength.
- A 2026 lab analysis found several ecdysteroid supplements contained substantially less than their labels declared.

Dinan et al. · J Insect Sci · 2003 · PubMed 15841223 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Harris et al. · Muscles · 2024 · PubMed 40757520 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Wilborn et al. · J Int Soc Sports Nutr · 2006 · PubMed 18500969 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Todorova et al. · Molecules · 2026 · PubMed 41976134 · screenshot via Europe PMC - #10BoronTested, didn't budge
Testosterone went up in both groups, including the placebo group. The researchers found boron had no effect.
See the studies (2)
- In 1993, 19 bodybuilders took boron or a placebo for 7 weeks. The training raised testosterone; boron didn’t add anything.

Ferrando & Green · Int J Sport Nutr · 1993 · PubMed 8508192 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Ferrando & Green · Int J Sport Nutr · 1993 · PubMed 8508192 · screenshot via Europe PMC - #9Tribulus terrestrisTested, didn't budge
In a 4-week trial in young men, testosterone didn’t differ from placebo.
See the studies (1)
- Sold as an aphrodisiac and a testosterone booster. The paper’s title says it plainly.
- It wasn’t among the exceptions in the 2024 review, which included 4 Tribulus studies.

Neychev & Mitev · J Ethnopharmacol · 2005 · PubMed 15994038 · screenshot via Europe PMC - #8MacaTested, didn't budge
No effect on any of the hormones measured, testosterone included.
See the studies (2)
- A root grown high in the Andes. Tested in a 12-week, placebo-controlled trial.
- The same research team also reported that men taking maca had more sexual desire, and the paper’s title spells out its “absent relationship” with testosterone. So maca might do something, just not through testosterone.

Gonzales et al. · J Endocrinol · 2003 · PubMed 12525260 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Gonzales et al. · Andrologia · 2002 · PubMed 12472620 · screenshot via Europe PMC - #7D-aspartic acidMoved only in specific people
It rose in one short study. In men who lift, nothing, and at a higher dose, total testosterone went down.
See the studies (3)
- In 2009, 23 men took it for 12 days, and their testosterone rose.
- In resistance-trained men, after 28 days of heavy training: no change.
- In another trial, at the higher of two doses, total testosterone went down. Who took part changed the answer.

Topo et al. · Reprod Biol Endocrinol · 2009 · PubMed 19860889 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Willoughby & Leutholtz · Nutr Res · 2013 · PubMed 24074738 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Melville et al. · J Int Soc Sports Nutr · 2015 · PubMed 25844073 · screenshot via Europe PMC - #6ZincMoved only in specific people
Zinc can fix a shortfall. Topping up a full tank is a different claim.
See the studies (3)
- In a small 1996 study, 4 young men had their dietary zinc restricted for 20 weeks, and their testosterone fell sharply. 9 older men who were low in zinc took supplements, and theirs went up (no control group).
- Young men already getting enough zinc took ZMA: no significant change.

Prasad et al. · Nutrition · 1996 · PubMed 8875519 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Prasad et al. · Nutrition · 1996 · PubMed 8875519 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Koehler et al. · Eur J Clin Nutr · 2009 · PubMed 17882141 · screenshot via Europe PMC - #5Vitamin DMoved only in specific people
Two placebo-controlled trials found no effect, in men with normal or low testosterone.
See the studies (3)
- In 2011, overweight men who were low in vitamin D took it for a year, and their testosterone rose compared with baseline.
- Then two placebo-controlled trials in Austria: healthy men with normal testosterone, no effect; men with low testosterone, no effect either.
- The most-studied booster in the 2024 review (10 studies). It wasn’t one of the exceptions.

Pilz et al. · Horm Metab Res · 2011 · PubMed 21154195 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Lerchbaum et al. · J Clin Endocrinol Metab · 2017 · PubMed 28938446 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Lerchbaum et al. · Eur J Nutr · 2019 · PubMed 30460609 · screenshot via Europe PMC - #4FenugreekModest signal
A 2023 meta-analysis found a small effect on total testosterone in male athletes. “Small” is the authors’ word.
See the studies (2)
- A seed that’s also a kitchen spice. Several trials, many using branded extracts.

Isenmann et al. · Int J Sports Med · 2023 · PubMed 37253363 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Khanna et al. · J Food Biochem · 2020 · PubMed 33025616 · screenshot via Europe PMC - #3ShilajitModest signal
One placebo-controlled trial, one extract: total and free testosterone rose compared with placebo.
See the studies (2)
- A mineral-rich resin that oozes from rock. The trial: men aged 45 to 55, 90 days, one purified extract.
- The 2024 review called that extract possibly effective for late-onset hypogonadism, the low testosterone that can come with age.

Pandit et al. · Andrologia · 2016 · PubMed 26395129 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Morgado et al. · Int J Impot Res · 2024 · PubMed 37697053 · screenshot via Europe PMC - #2AshwagandhaModest signal
A hormone number moved. How the men said they felt didn’t.
See the studies (3)
- In overweight men aged 40 to 70, testosterone measured in saliva rose 14.7% more than with placebo.
- The same trial found no difference in fatigue, vigor, or sexual well-being.
- The review rated ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) possibly effective for healthy men.

Lopresti et al. · Am J Mens Health · 2019 · PubMed 30854916 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Lopresti et al. · Am J Mens Health · 2019 · PubMed 30854916 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Morgado et al. · Int J Impot Res · 2024 · PubMed 37697053 · screenshot via Europe PMC - #1Tongkat aliModest signal
A 2022 meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials found total testosterone rose, including in men with low testosterone.
See the studies (3)
- A plant from Southeast Asia, also called Eurycoma longifolia.
- The urologists’ review rated it possibly effective, both for age-related low testosterone and for healthy men.
- Even so, the meta-analysis says more research is needed before it’s used in clinical practice.

Leisegang et al. · Medicina (Kaunas) · 2022 · PubMed 36013514 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Leisegang et al. · Medicina (Kaunas) · 2022 · PubMed 36013514 · screenshot via Europe PMC 
Morgado et al. · Int J Impot Res · 2024 · PubMed 37697053 · screenshot via Europe PMC
The best result on this list is “possibly effective”. That's not nothing. It's also not what the marketing promises. If you're worried your testosterone is genuinely low, the test isn't a supplement: it's a blood test, and a conversation with a doctor. This is an investigation of the claims, not a guide to taking them.
Get the one-page ranking + the checklist
The 12-booster ranking on one page, the 3-question checklist, and each new ranking when it drops.